Sonoluminescence – Scientific Evidence of Creation and Scriptural Cosmology

Stars are Light made from Sound IN WATER.

“And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light.”
‭‭Genesis‬ ‭1:2-3‬ ‭KJV‬‬

This is why the Scriptures teach that there is WATER above the Firmament. And also that the stars SANG.

This phenomena of SONOLUMINESCENCE has been recreated on earth in an actual laboratory, not in a studio with camera tricks like the science fiction/NASA/Star Wars space hoaxes.

Stars, Moons, Sun in the Firmament

“And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years.” Gen. 1:14

“Can you bind the beautiful Pleiades? Can you loose the cords of Orion? Can you bring forth the constellations in their season?”
Job 38:31-32

Why Did Dinosaurs become Extinct?

What if dinosaurs went extinct because God cursed all “serpents?”

Did you ever noticed that the only “serpents” that are still around are the ones whose bellies touch the ground and they lick dust and insects?

God created animals as different “kinds”, and maybe when he curse the serpent he was cursing the entire “kind” of animal, including all the species within that kind:

Genesis 3:14
And the Lord God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:

No word of God will ever fail. Even nature declares the glory of God, and you have to be willfully ignorant not to see the truth.

Glory be to God.

Hank Hanegraaff Exposed

I can’t wait till I get “exposed” one day. So I can change my beliefs closer to Jesus’s Word, and purify my actions too… Its important that we keep the words of God above the Words of men. No one is exempt.


From Ken Ham:

Hanegraaff wrote a book on the issue of creation titled The Creation Answer Book. I previously published a review on my blog.

Sadly, The Creation Answer Book made it evident that Hanegraaff does not hold to a literal Genesis (but buys into geological and astronomical evolution), as he was unwilling to understand Genesis in its most natural form—historical narrative.

In this more recent article, called “Leviathan, Dragons, and Dinosaurs, Oh My!” (CRJ, vol. 36, no. 2), Hanegraaff denies that the Bible’s accounts of the sea creature leviathan and the large behemoth (that we think is an apt description of what could be a sauropod dinosaur) are literal. Working through Job chapters 38–41, Hanegraaff claims that of all the things God lists to Job, these two creatures are meant to be understood as metaphors. He writes the following:

In sum, Leviathan and Behemoth are not dinosaurs but personifications that illustrate a metaphysical reality. As such, the mythology of the dragon underscores the reality of the Devil.

Well, he’s right on one count—leviathan was not a dinosaur, because only particular land animals (possibly behemoth) were dinosaurs. Leviathan was a sea creature, and thus was created on Day Five of Creation Week (Genesis 1:21). Hanegraaff, though, seems to think that some Christians believe leviathan was a dinosaur. At AiG, we understand the technical definition of dinosaur is for a group of land animals, and so we have never suggested leviathan was a dinosaur. Leviathan was a real animal that lived in the sea. The description could fit something like the great Kronosaurus, but we don’t know for sure.

What’s more, every other creature (living or nonliving) that God mentions in Job 38–41 (e.g., lion, raven, donkey, wild ox, ostrich, horse, locust, hawk, or eagle) are literal objects that Job saw. Why would God suddenly mention two “personifications” (which means to give living traits to an inanimate object or idea) in the midst of literal objects?

In fact, leviathan is mentioned repeatedly in Scripture (Job 3:8, 41:1; Psalm 74:14,104:26; Isaiah 27:1). There’s no denying this was a real creature that people were familiar with. Hanegraaff’s conclusion doesn’t make sense in light of all this, but it does reveal his denial of the fact that man lived alongside these great beasts (dinosaurs), which were also made on Day Six of creation along with man. God even pointed out to Job that behemoth was made along with you (Job 40:15).

Hanegraaff, however, relies on a “literary” understanding of Scripture. He says that means he reads God’s Word “in the most obvious and natural sense,” but his views on dinosaurs above clearly contradict that. In other words, he doesn’t believe that dinosaurs, which are land animals, were made on the same day as Adam.

But it actually gets worse: Hanegraaff also denies there was a literal serpent in the Garden of Eden that audibly spoke to Eve. He claims the following:

Eve was not deceived by a talking snake. Rather, Moses used the symbol of a snake to communicate the wiles of the Evil One who deceived Eve through mind-to-mind communication . . .

Now, Hanegraaff’s claim clearly contradicts the plain reading of Genesis 3, which has already been shown beyond doubt to be historical narrative. So how is his reading the “most obvious and natural”? Really, it isn’t. His view on the serpent here causes problems for how we’re to read 2 Corinthians 11:3, where the Apostle Paul clearly considers the serpent to be literal. Furthermore, Paul warns that just as the serpent (a real serpent) beguiled Eve, so Satan will use the same method on us. And that method was to get people to doubt God’s Word, which would lead to unbelief. Sadly, Hanegraaff, by his compromise position in regard to the serpent, is really getting people to doubt God’s Word in Genesis.

Because Hanegraaff holds to an old earth (and hence, also denies a global Flood), that in order to support his views, he has to explain away literal references to man and dinosaurs living alongside each other in Genesis—and that carries over into how he reads much of the creation account in Genesis.

It’s sad that influential Christians like Hanegraaff wholeheartedly accept many secular humanistic ideas like long-age geology and the big bang. When they accept these competing (anti-biblical) claims and mix them with their Christianity, something always has to give. Most people give up what the Bible plainly says in light of the “secular religion” of long ages. I want to encourage you to stand strong on the authority of God’s Word and watch out for these secular ideas in the church. Don’t mix these two religions (Hebrews 10:23). To do so is really no different than the Israelites mixing with the Baal worship of their day. Man’s fallible word should never be used to reinterpret God’s clear Word. To do so is to attack and undermine the authority of the infallible Word.


The Half-life of Carbon is only 5730 years old….

The Half-life of Carbon is only 5730 years old…. So when people tell you that carbon dating of fossils proves that the earth is millions of years old, they are lying.

“Let’s suppose we find a mammoth’s skull and we want to date it to determine how long ago it lived. We can measure in the laboratory how many carbon-14 atoms are still in the skull. If we assume that the mammoth originally had the same number of carbon- 14 atoms in its bones as living animals do today (estimated at one carbon-14 atom for every trillion carbon-12 atoms), then, because we also know the radiocarbon decay rate, we can calculate how long ago the mammoth died. It’s really quite simple.

This dating method is similar to the principle behind an hourglass.6 The sand grains that originally filled the top bowl represent the carbon-14 atoms in the living mammoth just before it died. It’s assumed to be the same number of carbon-14 atoms as in elephants living today. With time those sand grains fall to the bottom bowl, so the new number represents the carbon-14 atoms left in the mammoth skull when we found it.

The difference in the number of sand grains represents the number of carbon-14 atoms that have decayed back to nitrogen-14 since the mammoth died. Because we have measured the rate at which the sand grains fall (the radiocarbon decay rate), we can then calculate how long it took those carbon-14 atoms to decay, which is how long ago the mammoth died.

That’s how the radiocarbon method works. And because the half-life of carbon-14 is just 5,730 years, radiocarbon dating of materials containing carbon yields dates of only thousands of years, not the dates over millions of years that conflict with the framework of earth history provided by the Bible, God’s eyewitness account of history.”

– Dr. Andrew Snelling

Read the rest here.

A quote from Stan Rogers: 7 Non-Spiritual Reasons the Earth is only a Few Thousand – NOT Millions of Years Old

Stan Rogers Says:
December 3, 2012 at 7:16 PM | Reply

– As the sun burns it’s losing 5 feet of mass per hour which means it’s shrinking which means it use to be heavier which means gravity was also stronger. This tells us that 20 or 30 million years ago the sun would have been so big it would have torched the earth and boiled our oceans.

– Our calenders only go back to the year 4000 BC. The population curve started about 4500 year ago, the flood was about 4400 years ago. How many billions of people should we have by now?

– The oldest known living trees are Bristlecone pine tree which are about 4844 years old.

– When they drill for oil ,the pressure is so great it sometimes reaches 20,000 lbs per square inch and scientist say that the pressure should have leaked off in 10 to 15,000 yrs.

– Outer space is full of dust, so why did the astronauts only find less of an inch of it when they last landed on the moon if our solar system is a billion years old? They expected to find 8200 feet of it. This is why the craft had those big landing pads.

– The moon is getting further away from the earth at a rate of 1.5 inches per year ,so just one million years ago ,the earth would have flooded over twice a week due to high tide.

– The Mid- Ocean Ridge is a seam in the earth that wraps around the earth like a seam in baseball. Gradualism is blown apart by what happen in Mount St Helen.



2 Peter 3

For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:

Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:

But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.


You have to be ignorant WILLINGLY to ignore the fact that God destroyed the earth by a flood a few thousand years ago, and that He is going to destroy it again by fire and start it brand new with Jesus Christ installed physically as King!