SERAPIS and YOUTUBE Israelites

These wounded and fatherless Youtube Israelites that reject the Authority of the Scriptures love to say that the Christian faith came from pagan worshippers of Serapis. Their authority is based in fables, because they reject true Apostolic New Covenant Authority.

2 Peter 1:16 For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.

This so called “document” they quote from is a very well known forgery filled with anachronisms… just like a lot of the other pseudigraphical (non apostolic, non prophetic) fake books they like to quote from.

They are hungry for cultural validation because obedience to YAHUAH’s and YAHUSHUAH’s actual Commandments is too hard for them, so they would rather subvert your soul to Old Covenant Ordiances and their silly Youtube Research.

If they continue to reject the Gospel that could actually heal them, and continue to attempt to divide the Body of Christ, their end will be according to their works. Remember this: the JUDAIZERS are just as ANTICHRIST as the ROMANIZERS. If you are following after Youtube Israelites you might as well be following the Pope. It’s the SAME LAWLESSNESS.

 

 

From http://benstanhope.blogspot.com/2013/03/ray-hagins-is-wrong-serapis-letter.html

“I’d like to use this series to refute many of his key claims since they still get circulated heavily on the internet. To kick off, we will start with an extremely popular howler of his: the Serapis letter.

In Hagin’s presentation on the council of Nicaea, he belabors the claim that Christianity is based in pre-Christian, Egyptian religion and that Jesus never really existed. To start with, I challenge anyone reading this blog to name a single living scholar on earth holding a Bible or Classics related academic chair at any university who holds either of those positions. Here’s a hint: Big name New Testament scholars and researchers like Richard Carrier, Gary Habermas and Bart Ehrman have assessed those two extensively and there isn’t a single scholar holding a related university chair on earth who maintains either.

Hagins tries to show Christianity and Jesus evolved out of Egyptian religion by quoting the following correspondence “dated” to AD 134:

“Egypt, which you commended to me, my dearest Servianus, I have found to be wholly fickle and inconsistent, and continually wafted about by every breath of fame. The worshipers of Serapis [here] are called Christians, and those who are devoted to the god Serapis [I find], call themselves Bishops of Christ.”

So what’s the big deal? In short, this letter is a widely known FORGERY. It’s a FAKE.

Despite the obvious fact that the letter (if it were authentic) would be a century too old to demonstrate any meaningful Christian etiology, it is part of a late 4th century FORGERY entitled Historia Augusta. The Historia Augusta contains SO MANY ANACHRONISMS that it is easily dated to AD 395. The “Serapis letter” itself is full of anachronisms demonstrating this point. Hadrian was only in Egypt in 130, and the letter mentions his adopted son Lucius Aelius, who Hadrian did not adopt until six years after. Hadrian also salutes Servianus as consul, but Servianus did receive position as consul until 134. The letter also mentions the “Patriarch of Jewry,” a position that did exist until he created it after the Jewish Revolt in 132.

Glanwill W. Bowersock, in a proceeding volume of the Genevan conference on the Historiae Augusae gives a scholastic survey of the dating of the texts. He writes:

“The presence of fiction in the Historia Augusta is by now an established fact. The MISCHEVIOUS author of this work PRETENDED, as we all know, to be writing historical biographies; but this pretense, though compelling the inclusion of genuine historical material, imposed no perceptible limits on his wit and invention.”[1]

Günter Stemberger (PhD Jewish studies, Innsbruck and Göttingen), commenting on the Serapis letter confirms, “We should hardly assume the existence of an actual event on which these remarks were based.”[2]

There you have it. This source vaunted all over the web on Kemetic and free-thinking sites is a sham and everyone in the Classical field is aware of its dubious nature. The text is centuries too old to be written by who Hagins says it is, and it is far too late to contain any meaningful historical data which the forgery pretends to relate.

________________________________________

[1] “The Aethioica of Heliodorus and the Historia Augusta,” in Historia Augusta: Colloquium Genevense II., ed. Giorgio L. Bonamente (Italy: Edpuglia, 1994), 43.

[2] Jews and Christians in the Holy Land: Palestine in the Fourth Century, (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 2000), 244-5.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: